ccluster[a / b / biz / c / co / g / gg / global / k / lit / Movies / mu / nsa / pc / pol / sci / toon / tv / x]

Random - /b/[Catalog][Board FAQ]

[New Thread]
[?]

OT

TopBottom
Image Thumbnail

If you were given an unlimited budget to design a new home to live in, what would you do? For starters, since severe weather is something that occurs in my area once in awhile, I would make the project site on a hill or a higher elevation away from water then proceed to have the home built below ground to avoid occasional maintenance above (e.g. roof repairs, shingles missing, etc.). To make it accessible from the outside however there would be a large cement garage/shed? for me to park a vehicle in with an elevator to bring down large items such as furniture. If the power were to go out for any reason I would include a staircase on the side to get out. I would rely on solar panels on top of and near the outside entrance to keep a lower profile. I'd have a gaming room (filled to the brim with all the best RPGs, super comfy gaming chair, etc.), personal in-home theater, master bathroom with a sauna, hot tub and stand-up/sit-down shower with the built-in water-proof sound system. The main bedroom would be attached to the master bathroom out of sheer laziness. The kitchen would be staffed by a woman (a chef/nutritionist of course) with the most amazing body (per my preferences) and would also serve as my unwavering on-call sex toy 24/7 because she would live with me. She'd have her own room but the only bed in the home would be in my room. But she'd have access to a large closet for her clothes and shoes to tease me with. There would be security cameras all over the fucking place and a secret monitoring room that only I would know how to access. In fact, I'd make it so there are secret passages all over the fucking place to get to secret rooms/bunkers to hide out in. Basically it'd be like the ideal man cave but bigger.

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>225423 I'd just buy a used RV and cook meth.

>>

>>225423 seems like a hell one goes to curl up and die. you need natural sunlight

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>225423 1) it would be built on a large piece of land that is isolated and free of neighbors, while at the same time being a close enough distance from first world commodities for convenience. 2) in a location with good laws, no severe natural disasters, and overall nice diverse weather. 3) a moat, large impenetrable stone wall, and drawbridge surrounding the main property 4) livestock and crops that provide enough yield for daily eating (tended to by unpaid servants that can cook well) 5) small servant house as for the main house itself i`m not sure yet, too much consideration that i don`t want to do right now

>>
Image Thumbnail

If anyone's ever seen the movie Deus Ex Machina, the isolated forest house would be another optimal set up. Of course, I'd make it closer to a town and have a tunnel built underneath that would lead out to a secluded dirt road in the middle of the woods so that people wouldn't be able to find it real easily. If anyone did stumble upon something, it would just be the random field full of solar panels. Another option to hide one's wealth would be to buy a shitty house in the city and then hire a firm to build a secret home underneath it so no one would really know about it. Although extending from the basement would be tricky with the shared pipes and cable lines nearby. Would have to go down a good 50 foot staircase/elevator (?) to bypass all of that.



Image Thumbnail

/b/ chose me pickup lines to say. I will message what ever is typed

>>

>>225573 The dong wants to rub your thong

>>

>>225576 Only one so far

>>

>>225586 >>225587 >>225588 >>225589 >>225590 >>225591 >>225592 >>225593 >>225594 >>225595 >>225596 >>225597 >>225598 >>225599 Gotta do all these too OP.



Image Thumbnail
Thread was moved to Off Topic

Has anyone ever been close to or has been caught in the act of getting of before? In public or private? I've jacked off in public a few times but I made sure the few people around could not see or hear me. But never completely out in the open. >inb4 old article--still relevant though https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/4wb4m9/blackburn-man-does-five-lines-of-cocaine-has-a-forty-minute-wank-in-a-beer-garden-is-arrested-303



Image Thumbnail

What is supreme bliss to you? Don't hold back, we can all trust gad that we are really anonymous here

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>225501 >>225502 smiting spam ; _ ;



Image Thumbnail

How many people are still left on this site? I know the spam has been a deterrent but it's just so fucking slow nowadays. I know there's at least 2 mods, not sure if one of them is the anonymous chum over at PC or not though. I'm one of the namefags there. Then we got drawfag, so there's potentially 3-4 and I'm not even going to include the spammers but there is the TLCultist and a pedo sperg. Not sure if the chum with over 9k posts (literally) falls into any group I've noted so far is also the same fag who has apparently been here since the beginning and likes to brag about it occasionally. Then we've got gadmin/gadette. Am I missing any regulars? A h doesn't count because he only shows his face here when he gets banned from somewhere.

28 replies and 11 media omitted.
>>

0 people evry1 are jst bots

>>

>>224741 >>224741 >>224741 Thank goodness for this.

>>

Don't worry chum(s), I was taking a break.

>>

>>223816 chum cluster will never die, we'll be here forever

>>

>>225486 For some reason I believe you're the spammer...



Image Thumbnail

Socialists justify their position by stating that it is the worker's that actually do everything, not bosses. In that case, why don't all the worker just get together and pool their money to start a new business where the profits are shared in a socialistic way, and compete with the capitalist businesses? You don't need to change a society from capitalist to socialist to have socialist work environments. So why don't they just do that? pls respond [/b/admin don't off topic pls]

4 replies and 2 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

>>223630 >Implying anyone posts on /pol/

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>223635 Eh.. just sayin'

>>

>>223636 Who's this normie slut?

>>

>>223629 DON'T POST THAT, SOCIALISM AT A GOVERNMENT LEVEL WORKS, WE JUST NEED TO TRY AGAIN, AND AGAIN, AND AGAIN, AND AGAIN...

>>

>>223629 It has been done, didn't work. Google it, it's faster.



Image Thumbnail

>>

>>225581 on top of everything, tor is blocked on 4chan so OP must really be lying. Still a point, legally brits can go to jail for using nazi flag and saying things

>>

>>225582 4Chan is Tumblr, there's no coming back from SJW land.



Image Thumbnail

What is your opinion on naturally-produced skin cream chums? Anyone here get to share it or take advantage of it in some form or another?

1 replies and 1 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

make this off topic

>>

>>225153 >>225154 Replying to yourself yields no real interest

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>225163 you have to remember that on and off topic threads are chosen purely because of badmin's preference. naturally produced skin cream is badmin approved and sponsered by /b/

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>225167 Nop, the OP is not me.

>>

>>225167 Hi OP, trying to deflect your samefagging again huh?



Image Thumbnail

Well.. looks like the spammers have spammed the whole site

1 replies and 1 media omitted.
>>

>>224465 Speaking of which... Thanks Gad!

>>

I reported, but trusted account and all

>>

huh

>>

Site still getting spammed into oblivion I see.

>>

>>225260 It's not as bad but the problem clearly has not gone away. This is why I continue to complain about gad/ette's lack of activity/work here because other similarly smaller *chans are getting the same type of spam now but they are able to nip it in the bud before more than one or two posts are made unlike here where it's a stream of it for a set amount of time.



Image Thumbnail

When you interact with a person you don't know your mind asses the unspoken language of your interlocutor in order to decide if you have in front of a threat or not. That's pretty usual. I wonder, of us 5, what kind of "signs" you look for in the other person (consciously) attitude, words, body language, etc to decide if you're in front of a friendly person or a threat? In my case I use to listen to the silences, I don't talk a lot, I prefer to let the other do the talking and I pay attention to what he or she leaves unspoken. IDK why I do that, I just do it that way.

1 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>

>>221995 > but how someone is dressed That's very interesting, what conclusions can you extract from the way of dressing? I see obvious conclusions in women, but I'm not sure if I could get hints with guys.

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>221994 considering that 99% of passerby pose no actual threat, this is not something that usually crosses my mind. if you are within the vicinity of a dangerous person, it should only take common sense to detect. that being said, a lot can be gauged from visuals alone, before you even speak or interact with someone, the way they conduct and present themselves can speak measures about their character.

>>

>>222090 Actually clothes and specially shoes tells me more about the idiosyncrasy of the person than the personality. Of course the fight or flight response won't only apply to actual threats but also to things that won't jeopardize your life, for example detecting a rat in your work environment, or that guy that you know he'll stab you in the back as soon as he gets the chance. You don't know why, you don't know the guy enough, but you're certain about it. That kind of attitude is extremely hard to read from the clothes alone for me.

>>

>>221995 Here, I forgot that I posted in this thread. Sorry for anyone who happened to be curious for a response. Sure, clothes aren't a sure way to see a threat, but I live in a city so anyone with baggy clothing or just generally ratty/hoodlum clothes is what I had in mind when I wrote this post.

>>

>>224541 That gives you some clues about the person. Comfortable clothes with trendy brands will show a person acutely aware of the opinion of others over themselves. If the person carries a gun forget the analysis and run...



Image Thumbnail

__ __________ .____ ____ _________ _______ / \ / \_____ \ | |\ \ / / _ \ \ \ \ \/\/ // | \| | \ Y / /_\ \ / | \ \ // | \ |__\ / | \/ | \ \__/\ / \_______ /_______ \___/\____|__ /\____|__ / \/ \/ \/ \/ \/

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>223762 Fail a i l

>>

>>223762 top fail t o p f a i l



Image Thumbnail

Is the new librechan? https://lolifox.org/lg/ or http://brchanansdnhvvnm.onion/lg/ Lets see how long this one lasts lol

11 replies and 4 media omitted.
>>

>>223275 True true

>>

>>222542 It's https://chanpink.com/campus/ tbh

>>

The site is back up, including the pedo board /lg.

>>

>>223854 Now run by the FBI

>>

>>223854 enjoy the honeypot



Image Thumbnail

Spammer's back. I guess peace and quiet is just too much to long for on here besides a more active gadmin.

28 replies and 5 media omitted.
>>

>>223893 >Tor with JavaScript enabled You do know how 99% of child molesters get caught right?

>>

>>223897 You're missing the point. Booing a chum just because "hurr durr js' enabled" is just retarded. Better if everyone suspects you're an idiot than open your mouth and confirm it, right?

>>

>>223897 So that's how you got caught the last time around huh? It's no wonder why you know so much about stuff like this.

>>

>>223906 Lamest... trolling... ever...

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>222300 >Guaranteed replies



Image Thumbnail

You guys enjoying your spam reporting duties? I was on the other day and there was spam going back like 15+ pages so I left lol.

4 replies and 1 media omitted.
>>

>>223189 tbh I didn't notice any difference.. We got your back chum

>>

>>222960 What happened to the bear? Why is it all bandaged up?

>>

>>222960 i think i'm the only mod left when i took a week off three threads of spam whining popped up not enjoying it but you gotta do what you gotta do

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>223719 Nah brah, I'm still here too..

>>

>>223761 then were two left long gone are the days mods made the autistic spammer screech in agony i miss those days



Image Thumbnail
Thread was moved to Off Topic

This thread is to cleanse the /b/ picture from the front page. It doesn't have other purpouse.

160 replies and 118 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

>>225341 Of course the more the merrier :3

>>
Image Thumbnail

More trash to clean, figures!

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>225513 Awe, don't be envious, everyone's welcome!



Image Thumbnail

This once happened..

21 replies and 5 media omitted.
>>

>>222401 I'm lazy, I know, but thanks anyways chum.

>>
Image Thumbnail

ayyyyyy I made it in the screenshot multiple times

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>222932

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>222934

>>


Image Thumbnail

>a h Miss me

11 replies and 8 media omitted.
>>

Shitpost of the day: SLAP THAT ASS RED, BABY!

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>225257 >attention whore Kek

>>

>>225258 I know this place is slow but it ain't MolesterChan anymore so post your cheesy pizza elsewhere.

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>225276 >attention whore Chillax brah ..



Image Thumbnail
Thread was moved to Off Topic

Someone post the Lauren Mayberry/Inna model comparison pic pls.



Image Thumbnail

Is it really supporting CP producers by seeing their photos and watching their videos? Aren't they going to keep on making their content regardless of people watching it? Isn't the point of people posting their hobbies is to feel good about themselves and subtly brag about it? One cannot truly think people connect to the internet and post their hobbies to "connect" to others, right? I don't think it's possible to have such a motivation. This is regardless of the content, by the way - whether or not it's legal or not. That's why I think people do this, but I can also see the possibility of them posting it to get more content as well. For example, a photographer would post photography so others will post more as well. However, the subject isn't fully a post for a post deal, but people posting something and other latching onto it. So, I think it can be possible to "support" them, I think it's a lot more likely it's the content creators supporting other content creators. It's like having a forum where donations are required for it to run, but only donators are truly directly supporting it. In the case of sharing a website, I think that's another contributing factor to such a thing growing, but more likely than not, more leeches (non-supporters, lurkers, etc.) will come to see the forum, and donators will be a minority. I think that CP cannot fall under this model for the reason that it's anonymous and illegal, and can scare off potential producers - who will be targeted first - as well as donators, who will refrain from taking the risk of supporting the product. Sharing over an anonymous connection is actually a lot easier though since you're not as likely to be targeted (especially if you link to a place that you can find such content).

3 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>

>>224974 2. As every single human activity carried on by males they turn it into a competition the more you rape kids, the greater you are among your circle of pedos. The more consumption of the material the more self reinforcement of 1. and 2. which causes even more content to be produced and don't get me wrong: "produce content" mean destroy the minds and bodies of innocent kids. Now why I said specifically males? Woman acts differently, while they have a really high percentage of child abuse in a domestic environment they wont turn it into a self justification nor a competence so their profile is very low, usually undetected, that's why you rarely see any video of a woman abusing a kid, they are very few and in between and the sad reality is they are much more numerous than you would think. tl;dr: Even if it were legal, consuming pedo porn supports and encourage real molesters to continue ruining kids.

>>

>>224975 3. The dangerous slope. So if you fuck a 17.99999 year old is a crime and if you fuck her the next day everything is dandy, where's the logic on that? While that's technically true the line must be defined somewhere, because the molester will always try to force it. If 17.9999 is ok then let's try the consent age, let's say 16. If 17.9999 is ok lets say 15.9999 is ok too, right? Consent is stupid anyway since the kid is sexually mature (let's conveniently forget the psychological maturity because it won't fit into my self delusion narrative), so 12! ...or 11.99999, it's the same, right? With the appropriate mental gymnastics you can reach to the conclusion that the ideal age to engage in sex is on the 3rd month inside the mother.

>>

>>224976 4. The tool. Consuming pedo porn encourages molesters. I'm not agree with the official explanation that if you have sex with a doll that resembles a kid then you will go out to rape real kids, that's stupid, but give an audience and attention to a molester and it will be like trying to put out a fire by throwing petrol at it. I mentioned dolls because if you are a pedo but not a molester you can fap on anime, lolis, etc there's enough material for pedos to make them fap until the next millennia, and it's not the real thing, they damage no one. The problem here is pedo porn starts and ends on the pedo, kids are replaced, switched and when older discarded, they are just tools for the human trash and their audience. While statistically insignificant I'm sure there's kids sexually active by themselves from a very young age, but you won't ever see videos of them. The poor kids you see in the videos are just tools to be consumed. A molester won't care, their audience won't care either, that lack of humanity make them monsters and that's why in my personal opinion belong in jail.

>>

>>224977 Conclusion: A molester (unless it's a clinical psychopath) will know and understand what he's doing is wrong (read Lolita for a good portrait of the tortuous thinking of a pedo), and having an audience validates his actions. The problem of the molester is that even the most hysterical anti pedo won't think in the kids. they are the motivation of the hysteria but they never loose their anonymity, they are just holes, more or less innocent. I hate to use this word but it's the quintessential objectivization of a human being, and if you watch kiddie porn you're part of it. Oh, and also jail time. That's all I have to say about it.