Please follow https://twitter.com/enrive_org and retweet/like some of the stuff posted in there. That could go a long way in letting people know we exist, especially since we are somewhat hidden from search engines. Anyway, new global thread for you to pour out your heart's contents.
>>26202 >>26202 why did u change the image not found pic, fucking nigger
Dear stormfags (assuming we even have that in a place as free as masterchan). When you say you are against 'degeneracy', it means you are in favor of doing what is 'natural'. Well, do I even have to explain myself further? Just look at the picture. If you want women to shave their armpits, you are being a degenerate. In your life you hardly ever do what is 'natural'. Don't use that as an excuse, it makes you look stupid as fuck.
>>7835 We'll break her bones? I know plenty of people who've had sex as kids, and even been raped as kids, and they're - at least physically - fully functional. Even their little pussies work as they should. You sound pretty psychotic, so I'm going to have to ask you for some sources for your claims. >>7836 >true sexuality >full implications of sex This is a No True Scotsman fallacy. >she will suffer lasting psychological damage and trauma Speaking from my own experience, the only think I suffer from, is anti-pedos like you. >not as a result of the intolerance of society to adult-child relationships, but precisely because of the reasons this intolerance has come about in out societies in the first place, No, there's a study in the Amos thread that refutes exactly this claim. Do you want me to link it? >as an adult, she would not have consented to things she gave her consent to in the past, and this means that she will retroactively understand her experiences as rape, So what? Have you never done weird and stupid things as a kid? I don't care that some guy fucked me. I was just a kid. I didn't know any better. I've also been raped as an adult, and that something completely different. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, you absolute lunatic. >to do otherwise is to willing delude herself as to the reality of what had actually happened So YOU define it as rape, and so SHE has to define it as rape. "She just has to." You're so full of bullshit.
>>7837 >Her brain's lack of a sexual component also provides significant limitations to what she can do as well, a woman can enjoy gagging on a cock because her brain's sexual center is using her sexual excitement to interpret the experience as pleasurable, a little girl's brain has no sexual center, at least, not one anywhere near as well developed as an adult woman, so her brain is just going to perceive this as her being choked to death, Then don't gag kids on your cock, if she doesn't want to? After all, there's two people involved here. Even as adults, you ask before you ram your cock into a woman's mouth. Some people don't like that, and I - for one - don't like to be rough in bed either. >same when a woman's brain reinterprets the stimulation of being penetrated vaginally or anally, to her it's just pain, overwhelmingly terrifying pain, to be resisted on an instinctual flight-freeze-or-fight level, she will cry and scream and kick and bite and do whatever she can to either bear through this or get herself away from it, and she will do so from a primal animalistic level. Look: Even two year olds gasp in pleasure from being fingered. They literally beg for more. They're not screaming or crying. They're genuinely loving it and feeling pleasure. You're just making shit up.
>>7838 >human children are designed by evolution to possess the tendency to follow the instructions of their surrounding adults without resistance, to the point where they will be likely to believe things they were told to be true by adults as children for the rest of their lives even when they have to ignore the most obvious evidence that these things they had learned are complete falsehoods. So what you're saying is that if you have sex with her, and she likes it, then she'll like sex as an adult. ...and the problem is... ..what exactly? The problem is that this form of sex doesn't fit into your narrow worldview, and that sounds more like a you problem. >All this means that a little girl will be very lacking in neurological ability to resist your commands, even those delivered in the most uncertain and open-ended ways will strongly influence her to cooperate with what she perceives you as desiring from her. Children have been known to initiate sexual contact of their own free will. I've initiated sexual contact myself as a kid. What is this schizophrenic bullshit you're spewing, and why is there just no end to it? Everything that you're saying here, is a bunch of lies. None of it is true. Even scientific studies disproves you.
>>7839 >fuck you pedofags, the science itself refutes you. Source, please. ...not that I've got time to read them, but at least you'll sound a bit more credible. >the more k-selected races of humanity have an instinctual moral and physical reaction of disgust to this, this is because we have few children and invest heavily in them, so the loss of one girl is far greater to us than to other types of humans. ...or more likely, we're more overprotective of our kids, because we don't want to let them elope with serial killers or actual rapists. ...and so we see predators where there are none. >has to settle for hot-dogging the vaginal slit or anal crease as his closest remaining option. I hear that even adults love doing this with eachother, but I guess "that's not the true white christian way". >There is a reason most people think Muhammad molested Aisha for as long as he was in contact with her, despite being said to have first had sex with her at nine, because sex is defined strictly as penis in vagina penetration and nine was the earliest age at which he could manage to get his little thingy inside of her. As I said: From my experience, pleasuring a two year old is just fine: They love it. I'm an actual expert on this subject. You're not.
It's amazing what a delusional fantasy world antipedos live in, where kids just explode if you poke them in the pus. I wonder how the human race survived back in medieval times, when having kids of your own at the age of 15, was perfectly normal. People must have just exploded left and right. "They're just rigged to explode, I'm tellin' ya! Don't poke 'em in the pus - they'll die!"
I'm listening to some "alt right" (crypto-nazis) retards right now, and it seems that the way that these people make up their minds, is through sheer psychotic delusion: "Uh, I heard that there was some bombings going on in Iran, and that they bombed a lot of women and children and innocent civilians, but that among them happened to be a general who was very pro US, and so now everyone's upset. Uh, that's what I heard." They just make up stuff in their own heads like Donald Trump, and call it politics! It used to be that rightwing meant pro upper class, and leftwing went pro working class. Nowadays rightwing means being batshit crazy, while leftwing means being remotely sane. ...or it this just how retarded people in the US have become? Have they abandoned even Wikipedia now, and just turned to the crackpipe for wisdom? The United States used to be a country. It used to be something you could respect, even though all it did was invade countries whenever it saw fit. Yes, it was evil, but at least to contained some semblence of intelligence. At least these people weren't just a bunch of niggers. You're just a bunch of niggers now. You voted some psychotic idiot into power, you withdrew from the climate agreement, and you're about to wage yet another "war on terror" where you are the actual terrorists. ...and you're okay with that, because while some of you down in California have been literally on fire, you're not on fire right now, and so that means that everything is okay. You're just scum. You have no redeeming qualities. The entire world hates you, and wish that you'd just leave. Please go to the moon, all of you! Go to Mars! You can't stay here!
"It used to be that rightwing meant pro upper class, and leftwing went pro working class." no, it never used to be that way at all, the right wing and left wing were both pro-working class, the only one's who were for the upper class were the monarchists, aristocrats, and imperialists, all of whom the US (left and right) fought against, and who no longer exist today in any meaningful numbers.
broadly speaking, the right wing believes in decentralization, privatization, government non-intervention, and the freedom and self-determination of the individual, they are very much in favor of private ownership of person and property, and the only rule of law being that all physical interaction with the person and/or property of another must be done with the informed consent of the owner, except in cases where others break this rule and the rule must then be broken to enforce it, even then, it is only flexible under these circumstances to the absolute minimum necessary. On the absolute right are the anarcho-capilatists who want to take all functions of the state and make them private, including law enforcement and national defense, this would inevitably devolve into countless warring private states and thus into neo-feudalism.
the left is the opposite, they like having the government do a lot of things, they like the safety net of government charity programs (welfare, healthcare, education, pensions, subsidies, bailouts, etc.), they want the fairness of the government taking from those who have more and giving to those who have less in order to equalize things (heavily taxing the wealthy to pay for programs that are supposed to benfit the poor), they like having lots of laws regulating the conduct of individuals and of businesses, such as morality-based laws against so-called victimless crimes, such as requiring businesses to have OSHA compliance, and such as making certain activities require the permission of the government in the form of a license, at the very extreme, they want to abolish private property and businesses, and make everything the property of the government which also manages all enterprises, the government acting as the representative of the people, and so technically, everything belongs to everyone, they try and make a distinction of personal property, but in effect all property will be ultimately be treated as being private when the government wants to control it on behalf of the people. They like worker's unions because it makes business further constrained, and they see businesses as like wild dogs that are potentially dangerous and must be leashed. This is socialism, and if they want this as a transitional stage to prepare for the time when the government abolishes itself, they are communist.
Originally both were very pro-religion and exclusively concerned with those of the white race, particularly white men, both the left and right have drastically changed overt the years, what I've listed is the only thing they still retain from those days. "Nowadays rightwing means being batshit crazy, while leftwing means being remotely sane." Nowadays being right-wing means being conservative, not libertarian, and being left-wing means being more towards non-religion, in favor of a whole slew of new laws that discriminate against whites and males, in favor or programs that explicitly favor non-whites and non-males, particularly those whose votes can easily be bribed with such promises, in favor of mass immigration with minimal restrictions, in favor of anti-natalism on the part of whites, in favor of homosexuality and transgenderism being treated as identities instead of mental illnesses, and a lot of other bullshit of the day fad causes that do no good and only make things worse for everyone except the people who took over the left and made it adopt these shitty ideas, they got a lot out of this arrangement, the world's suffering is their gain, and they can sell you literally any idea by telling you that it's the right thing to do. the modern left has all the worst qualities of old-school orthodox catholic kikestianity, the left isn't "remotely sane" there's just a lot of them and they are endorsed by the elites that run our societies as the "correct" thing to be, it's full of morally self-righteous fanatrics with no regard for reality and only for the apporval of "the cool kids of the rebellion (TM)" produced by the world's elite and their dystopian domination of media, education, corporations, and politics.
>"...or it this just how retarded people in the US have become? Have they abandoned even Wikipedia now, and just turned to the crackpipe for wisdom?" wikipedia is not credible as a source for information, first it was bad because it could be edited by anyone, now it's worse because it's being controlled by a small and nepotistic group of isolated wealthy assholes with too much power and a strong ideological bias, who are willing to lie pathologically and censor the truth to fap themselves silly over how controlling the minds of everyone makes them so fucking excited. the rest of what you say is untrue and completely divorced from reality so It's clear that you have no fucking clue what you are talking about, there is so much wrong with everything you say that I cannot possibly fit it all within this character limit.
Extinctionist thread. Most ideologies are about how to best save a population, how to make countries work, and how to minimize suffering. Extinctionism is different. It sees the human race for the disastrous biological plague that it is, and recogizes it as the ultimate problem. Therefor mankind's extinction is the solution. There are eco-extinctionists that want to exterminate the human race so that other lifeforms can live. I'm personally not of that persuasion. I think that other lifeforms are just as deplorable, and that if left to its own devices, life will just create a new sentient race and begin the whole cycle all over again. We therefor need to make sure that the whole planet is as uninhabitable as possible, so that it will stay dead forever. Only in death does true peace and justice prevail. I believe that if your society rejects you unconditionally, then you should unconditionally reject your society, and seek to destroy it. Do not seek to feed the mouth that bites you. ...and if your species rejects you as irredeemable, then you should seek your species' extinction. This includes embracing any secondary political system that you believe will result is as much devastation as possible, especially when it comes to the most powerful countries, to ensure that smaller destroyed countries will not simply be invaded by other countries. Nuclear war would be a really good outcome, and voting for Donald Trump is a given.
>>7821 We thank you for your useful idiocy. We should create more of you - build more churches instead of schools, sponsor Fox News while cutting funding to other news channels. How would you like a breeding program?
Freedom is a concept that we're taught exists in this cage, somewhere underneath a surface layer of duty and morals where you're not allowed to be who you are, and should feel ashamed over yourself. We're programmed to sit in neat little school rows and listen. A lot of what you're taught is quite useful and truthful, but ultimately you're meant to use what you've learned to the benefit of your masters - the keepers of your cage.
If you behave , and if you become an asset to them, they will reward you with money in return. With money you can eat and attract women. At least that's the promises they give you - the illusion of choice to either "rot" or "prosper". "Criminality" is a faux pas. Taboos are everywhere, and so you internalize your oppressors into your very will, and the brainwash is complete. You are taught to respect your "fellow" man as he stabs you in the back. Even as you are raped and robbed, you are told to be a good citizen and behave yourself like nothing's happened. Suddenly injustice is called justice, and the true face of the world is revealed, where you are nothing but cattle.
It is only by renouncing society, and all its laws and rules, that you can become truly free, and freedom is something that your captors fear more than anything. A free man is a rebel - a liability. ...but an extinctionist is not just a rebel, or just a terrorist. He is a traitor. He seeks to unravel and destroy any rule he can, in a fight against the cage itself. He may not destroy enough to break it, but he may just weaken it enough to the next man to finish the job. He knows that the flaw of injustice lies not in every ideology that man has ever conceived, but in life itself: How base instincts corrupt every good intention from within.
We are the true carriers of the disease, our limited fleshbased minds locked in a neverending failing struggle to interpret reality, coming up with nothing but mockeries and heresy, that we seek to pass on to new generations. This selfreplicating hormone induced insanity, is an abhorrent upheaval of the rational order of death. We are nothing more than mold stains on the surface of Earth. We need to be sanitized.
https://youtu.be/v8NP_Uuq8nk >Economic Intercourse The first US president with dementia
>>7781 Biden will make unwanted inappropriate touching Great Again!
>>7786 >OP post is not just a one time slip It's just one time "slip". It's always just "one time slip", every single election. The US election is nothing but a meme war.
>>7785 >That is not the same thing as dementia. "There are many different types of dementia. According to the National Institute on Aging, the most common is Alzheimer’s disease. Other types include: Lewy body dementia frontotemporal dementia vascular disorders mixed dementia, or a combination of types There are 10 typical early signs of dementia. For a person to receive a diagnosis, they would usually experience two or more of these symptoms, and the symptoms would be severe enough to interfere with their daily life." Early signs of dementia that Trump is displaying: - Memory loss. - Difficulty planning or solving problems. - Difficulty doing familiar tasks. - Being confused about time or place. - Challenges understanding visual information. - Problems speaking or writing. - Poor judgment or decision-making. ...and it's not like with Biden, that there's just a few clips of him displaying this that has been clipped out of context: This is a constant theme with Trump. ...and the way that he hid it, was to illegally raid his doctor's office and dispose of all his medical papers during his election campaign, and then have another doctor lie about him being in fucking olympian health.
>>7807 >no, you You failed m8 Biden constantly makes no sense. Trump will get reelected in another landslide victory..
>>7810 Oh FFS, I don't even know if you're being sarcastic now.
With Amos Yee now being back, resparking the pedo rights movement, it's about time that his thread migrated from the /newchums/ board, to the more official /pol/. During his absence, Amos seems to have gotten his life in order, changed his stance on AOC to be at the age of four rather than at the age of 0, and apologized for banning people. Here's his channel, his new name being Kino: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCokZ_ShUOz-tBqJDdsF_WoA He also gets along well with his archive channel, which is easy to find. His opponents in the comment section - mostly nazis - are of course as frothing as ever, and fun to trigger and systematically report for hatespeech.
With the world all going to shit now, I stopped paying attention to pedo rights for a few months, but it seems that Amos's "buddy" (intense activist and former fan) Youth Liberation, is also gone, deleting his main account (on FreeSpeechTube) on 26 January 2020. https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10g7 https://www.instagram.com/isityourmind/ His disappearance isn't as suspicious, though: His name isn't scrubbed from search engines, and he's had a previous history of removing his own content and accounts. On 23 January 2020 FreeSpeechTube also got hit by a Search and Seizure from police, which probably spooked a lot of their members, regardless of them being anonymous or not. FreeSpeechTube owner Norbert had this to say: "Possibly related [to the search and seizure], Today is the second time that "Youth Liberation" deleted his account and (thus) all his content. First as Morphintous, and today as Worldstarhiphop (28 videos, text). Even when he's not deleting accounts, he has the tendency to manually delete his content. I see that user -wz- still has four of "Youth Liberation"'s videos. https://www.freespeechtube.org/?search_query=YL " - Source: https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/11dp/2725 The internet will be empty without these two. Who am I supposed to watch NOW? :.(
>Who am I supposed to watch NOW? ...and don't tell me to go watch EQF-OLF or WarmPotato on that pretentious quasi-skeptic semi-PC FreeSpeechTube website, because they're seemingly just bringing up historical cases or other people. I want to watch one of those intellectuals who FreeSpeechTube bans, and hear their own ideas.
>>7711 black people can be pedos too?
>>7713 Judging by Lolibooru, hentai featuring a black guy making love to a child, is a bit overrepresented, actually. I'm surprised as well. I thought pedophilia was a white highculture thing.
Well, over four months later, we get some life signs: He's not dead, if a contact-of-a-contact is to be believed. He's not in a camp, so we don't need to mail Amnesty. ...and we now have the reason for his disappearance too. I find this rather amazing: The guy had the thickest skin when it came to his opponents, but the thinnest when it came to his supposed ideological allies. Other people would have discussed, mediated, and maybe tried to adapt, but Amos quit not only his FreeSpeechTube account, but all his other accounts as well, as if FreeSpeechTube was his only hope. ...but then again, I guess taking up a dayjob wouldn't be so bad for him. It's a much more stable income.
Red pill Thread
Jews are just 1.4% of the US population and 0.0025% of the world population >Senate (9% jewish, 650% US over-representation) Michael Bennet (D-CO) Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) Benjamin Cardin (D-MD) Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) Jacky Rosen (D-NV) Brian Schatz (D-HI) Bernie Sanders (I-VT) Chuck Schumer (D-NY) Ron Wyden (D-OR)
>House (8% jewish, 600% US over-representation) David Cicilline (D-RI) Stephen Cohen (D-TN) Susan Davis (D-CA) Ted Deutch (D-FL) Eliot Engel (D-NY) Lois Frankel (D-FL) Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) David Kutsoff (R-TN) Andy Levin (D-MI) Mike Levin (D-CA) Alan Lowenthal (D-CA) Nita Lowey (D-NY) Elaine Luria (D-VA) Jerry Nadler (D-NY) Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) Dean Phillips (D-MN) Jamie Raskin (D-MD) Max Rose (D-NY) Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) Adam Schiff (D-CA) Kim Schrier (D-WA)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) Brad Sherman (D-CA) Brad Schneider (D-IL) Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) Susan Wild (D-PA) John Yarmuth (D-KY) Lee Zeldin (R-NY) >Supreme Court (33.3% jewish, 2,400% US over-representation): Ruth Bader Ginsburg (D) Stephen Breyer (D) Elena Kagan (D)
>>7706 >>7707 >>7708 Jewish superiority confirmed. B)
>>7709 So just how are jews superior? Well, jews are altruistic, trustworthy, civilized, compassionate, and just. They are everything that you'd want from a good leader. The torah is a source of much wisdom and intelligence needed to rule well. ...and the overrepresentation that we're seeing, is proof of that: These leaders have been elected because they have demonstrated themselves to have all the above characteristics. ...so if you wish to become a great leader, then pick up the torah today. It has much to teach you.
>>7811 I'm not white, I'm Jewish. Biden was so handsome with them sideburns tho..
>>7813 >White's Master Race reporting in. Yes, we invented and discovered just about everything. Stay mad chum. It's cute to watch you throw a gigantic fit in every thread sperg lord. >>7814 He was a handsome tot too!
>>7814 >I'm not white - I'm jewish. You're white. You're just not caucasian. You're not white to RETARDED people, though, but you can't be white to everybody.
>>7815 >Yes, we invented and discovered just about everything. ...and nobody cares. The Chinese invented gunpowder, the Arabs invented math, and the Europeans invented a lot of stuff, and yet YOU didn't invent ANYTHING. Not a single goddamn thing. You are not your race. You are not an inventor. You can't even categorize people properly. You are not going to invent anything useful in your lifetime. >Stay mad chum. ...says the guy flameposting about how jews are earning more money than him. Jealous much? The Chinese is out-earning you in "your own" country. I bet that must sting a bit. You could have done something with your life. You could have joined a winning team, but no, instead you wanted to associate with a losing team, because somewhere around Anchient Greek Times, they invented some shit. Not anymore, though. NOW what our skincolor is known for, is obesity, and racist retardation. We're known for trailor trash. That's the group of people that you decided to bet on. I couldn't be mad at you even if I tried. You did this to yourself. >It's cute to watch you throw a gigantic fit in every thread sperg lord. Do you want me to count every single post you've made in this thread, motherfucker? ...each containing an entire PAGE's worth of assmad bullshit? I think you're confusing "throwing a fit" with "smacking you around like a little bitch".
>UCLA researchers have found that it is possible to assess a person's ability to feel empathy by studying their brain activity while they are resting rather than while they are engaged in specific tasks. Setting aside the current limits or faults of current technology, give me ONE reason why passing empathy tests should not be mandatory for politicians. This is the real redpill. If we ensure our leaders are empathetic, the world only gets better.
yes, A true EMPATHY TEST WOULD CHANGE THE WORLD. THERE COULD BE BREEDING of high empathy people with each other . creating a ...better race of humans . we could sterilize low empathy people and out right sociopaths . this is not a joke , its a game changer . it could even become part of the "designer baby " tech that is coming soon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Designer_baby. people would choose to have a high empathy baby
>>7703 There is a catch though. Too much empathy but no self preservation also leads to someone who lets others take advantage of you. Leaders cannot be selfless all the time. A blend of empathy and self preservation (aka fairness) is needed. I don't know if we can measure that fairness yet, but starting with empathy at least gets corrupt and evil people out of the government
>>7704 yes , of course. the "new race' of high empathy folks would be Keenly aware of this and adjust as needed in any given situation . the most 'highly prized" people would be the" high empathetic-high intelligence" folks. (and this could someday be artistically selected for) by this time we almost certainly would have a/the AI Singularity. all of human decisions would be made by the people listed above and their AI counterpart .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity it is the real, the true, the honest "Eugenics". We (HUMANS) have stolen Evolution away from nature ...and we will be better for it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity#Next_step_of_sociobiological_evolution
I want to do my own Amos Yee campaign thing now - I'm inspired. I want to be Amos Yee for an hour. Just allow people to have sex however they want. Fuck consent. Abolish it. Not just age of consent, but consent altogether. If you love somebody, and you want to show your love in some exotic way, then don't restrict yourself according to some taboo. Your preference matters. Just go for it: Rape with evil glee, if that's love to you. Torture. Kill. Whatever. Love is always a beautiful thing if shared. The rape laws right now are forbidding even people in a relationship to rape eachother in various ways. Dominance is considered "being abusive", et cetera. Some people want to eat the woman of their dreams, and some women would love to get eaten. Just go for it. Legalize everything, and everyone will be more fulfilled for it. Even if you first meet via a rape in an alley, that's okay. Women have tremendous rape orgasms from being forced - that's no secret - and when you have sex you learn to fit together, so why not as rapist and victim? Just rape her and then you can go get married and live happily ever after.
I think it's not just me who's had a crush on a celebrity like a movie star, where you genuinely love them, especially when acting. I should have the right to look them up, and - if need be - break into their house, and just love them. Paradoxically some movie stars are privately actually pretty lonely and unfulfilled, and would love for a real fan to really appreciate their work even intimately. As it is now, with all these bullshit laws, we're all being cucked on a global scale. She may not know you yet, but what kind of deranged asshole would turn down free love? She'll get to know you eventually, and making love to her while she's wearing her movie outfit, that's not just a start, but the best possible start. Don't feel ashamed - if you're jerking off to her, then you know it's the right thing to do. Abolish the consent laws. Make love bloom like never before.
Zoe Quinn recently highlighted the issue of why abuse-shaming need to stop. She just drove a man to suicide from just publicly shaming him for being "abusive", whereupon he got fired from his job, et cetera. Keep in mind that Zoe clearly gets off on being abused. She'll suck cock for good reviews, she'll post her nudes online, and do all kinds of degrading studd, because she loves being a victim, since victims get respect and power. ...and so this guy was an ex whom Zoe had blamed for sexual abuse of her in the past, but it wasn't worse than that she had patched things up with him, gone to stay at his house, and got back to having sex with him. Her being a submissive, and him being dominant, they hit it off and started with power dynamics. She could leave at any time, but she "wasn't allowed to", and Zoe obeyed. She obeyed because she loved when this guy dragged her around by her pussy, and the pain that came with it, because she loves being used. She loved to be mentally destroyed by somebody else, and reduced to a victim. ...and that's okay.
However, Zoe couldn't bare the shame of wanting to be a victim. Among her feminist friends she was supposed to have dignity and demand respect. ...and so over time they guilted her - directly or indirectly - into blaming "her abuser" as a bad guy - somebody to abuse in turn, and whom women should beware and avoid. Zoe doesn't understand that most women love to be abused and victimized as much as she did, and so that's why she thought that he must be dangerous to other women. This second intimate betrayal, paired with him being ostracized and persecuted, proved to be too much for the guy. This wouldn't have happened if the consent laws were abolished. Then Zoe's invented blame would have meant nothing, and she would have had nothing to feel ashamed for. Consent laws ruin relationships in this way, and they ruin lives. Now Zoe will seek new guys to seduce into dominance, which she will then feel guilty about, and she will later betray.
There may be some male exceptions, but generally speaking women are physically made to be receptacles for passion, the strength of that passion being how mercilessly they can be forced. Consent laws weren't made for women. They were made for men, in hopes of safeguarding "htier" women from rivaling men. Consent laws only hurt women. If you don't want a complete abolishing, the laws can be changed so that only too rough sex can be made illegal: Sex which results in vaginismus and scars, and severe bodily injury, and with some degree of love behind it. Just rape whomever you want, as long as you do it responsibly and don't dump her afterwards. Rape to keep, especially if you cum inside.
my 7 yr old niece is a horny jack rabbit its crazy she grinds on my leg playing horsey , i dont know what to do im not going to call her out to make her feel bad or uncomfortable, if consent was not around we could openly discuss what she was doing or why, but as it is if i say anything it could be considered grooming or some other bullshit legalize term. so i stay away from her now which is a shame i really like her and im afraid she is the one who will be a victim to normy delusion. of age and right and wrong.
If the latest decades have shown us anything, it's that freedom and American values, is a horrible thing. People are just feeling free to ruin themselves left, right and center, when they really just belong in concentration camps. People think they have the birthright to speak too, thinking that if people are convinced into doing bad things, by carefully worded propaganda, that it's just their fault if they fell for it. I think that should go back to the feudal system, where the right to speak and do things, was EARNED. In the olden times this meant loyal service to the king, but in the modern times this means things like having graduated from a proper education. If you have a degree in chemistry, then you are allowed to speak of things related to chemistry, while having no education, means that you should know your place and keep silent. The same goes for the right to vote: This should be reserved only to people with some kind of degree in politics. We could invent a whole new school subject called "Voting". Human rights is a horrible philosophy, and anybody advocating for most of these, have not met any commoners. Commoners are uneducated, crazy, psychopathic bastards, who do good only by accident, and they need to either be firmly controlled, or erradicated. These people are crazy, especially in large numbers, and the only reason they've gotten rights to begin with, is because of this very reason, and the ruling class' unwillingness to resort to enough violent measure in response.
We need to stop rejecting fascist oppression as something blanket bad, and instead start to figure out how good fascist oppression looks like. There is a way to oppress responsibly. For example, oppressing pedophiles, or murderers and rapists, is bad, while oppressing psychopaths and nazis, is good. The whole idea of society is based on the oppression of psychopaths, and the whole idea of the enlightenment, is based on the oppression of the stupid peasantry and the church. ...so what I'd like to see, is countries taking their oppression seriously, and really justify their reasoning behind it, because a lot of the oppression I'm seeing, feels kind of arbitrary and poorly thought out. Also, the Iustitian system needs to be replaced. We can't just go around judging people based on their actions - that system doesn't really work. We need to judge people based on who they ARE instead. Put homeless people in prison and only let out those who have gotten an education or otherwise proven themselves, for example. We can't go on like this. We can't have insane people propagate that a nazi has as much of a right to speak as a decent person. That's how you end up with Donald Trump, among lots of other things.
The cause of all problems on this planet is not the Jews or any world government. It is not Illuminati or immigration. It is not any lizards or anything silly like that. It is psychopaths with the variation sociopaths and their followers; people with low intelligence. One way they make life more miserable for decent people is economically. A short and simple example follows. The big corporations are led by psychopaths. They pay bribes to US politicians and as they are corrupt to the bone they accept the bribes and follow the orders given by their overlords. These orders becomes laws. These laws are forced onto other countries by trade agreements. As the politicians in other countries have to low intelligence to understand the consequences of these laws they don't oppose them. The consequences are less competition in the markets, higher prices and a transfer of money from decent people to psychopaths. Some laws that has to be changed are the lengths of patents and copyrights. They should be much shorter. When a content creator dies the copyright should expire immediately. Collaborations should have a fixed, short expiration date. Anything else is nothing but stealing money from decent people. Banks are also stealing money from decent people. Why else would they have such good results. Salaries, inclusive bonuses, for executives should have a maximum level, they should not be allowed to steal money from decent people. Big pharma is also a scam, delivering inefficient drugs at atrocious prices. Drug research should be publicly financed and free of patents. Companies should compete on price and quality of the drugs they manufacture. The one percenters are psychopaths that succeeded in stealing money from decent people with the help of bribed or stupid politicians.
>>7675 >When a content creator dies the copyright should expire immediately. >kill a content creator >can now use his content for free
1/2 While psychopathy is indeed the problem, there is a much better solution. Psychopaths used to be locked up in insane asylums for being an inherent danger to others. However, because of campaigning humanitarians, this isn't done anymore. (An example of such a campaign is the recommendation campaign that has been promoted by YouTube these recent years, of Jon Ronson's speech at TED talks ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYemnKEKx0c ) as well as the mandatory pushes for psychopathy in TV series' by claiming that psychopaths would make good business leaders, simply because they're so statistically frequent. (See the Red Dwarf episode Cured for a recent example.) Today you can easily scan the brain of a person and determine whether or not that brain is fully functional, or if large parts of it (such as the frontal lobe) is malfunctioning. After that, arguing that a psychopath has to commit a crime in order for him to prove that he needs to be locked up, is like saying that a child has to die for it to be considered unwise to have let it play in traffic, or even be let near a street unsupervised. The ways in which psychopaths pose a danger to their surroundings is inherent, continuous and permanent, and it's only in rare and extreme cases, that law enforcement will be able to prove that any illegal acts have been commited after the fact. In many cases somebody has to die, before they act.
2/2 Just like children or disabled people, I do not wish harm upon psychopaths. I wouldn't call the intimate relationships I've had with them "functional" or "safe", but at least I know that evil people are people too. However, these people are in acute and dire need of supervision, and trying to ignore that, and just wait around for a murder to happen, either by them or in self-defense, is extremely irresponsible. These people need to be locked up in asylums, because having trained guardians supervising them around the clock, isn't feasible. If you want humane treatments, then make the asylums humane.
>Don't listen to trolls and other lying idiots. >I will not return to this thread or read any comments. So you're a troll then. :P
"Edward Brongersma (31 August 1911 in Haarlem, Netherlands – 22 April 1998 in Bloemendaal/Overveen, Netherlands) was a Dutch politician and doctor of law. For a number of years he was a member of the Dutch Senate for the Labour Party, and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He was primarily known for pedophilia advocacy and as an advocate of more lax legislation on public morality." - Wikipedia He's a clip of him, courtesy of Youth Liberation: https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/100V
Scoop: Trump suggested nuking hurricanes to stop them from hitting U.S. Source: https://www.axios.com/trump-nuclear-bombs-hurricanes-97231f38-2394-4120-a3fa-8c9cf0e3f51c.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic (I don't have anything to add. Vote Trump 2020.)
Angel here. As a perfect immortal, it is my right to rule. Let me tell you how I would usher you into a new era. Directly underneath me I would appoint generals with high-functioning brains, to govern you wisely with the stern hand of military might. My halls of government would be made clean and pristine, answering to the heavenly standard of obediance rather than freedom. I would do away with all the unspeakable filth of democracy - humanity and it's "rights", has shown what it's good for, and I think we can soar much, much higher. I would silence the voices of the wicked and the disabled mongrels, to let only the select caste of the worthy enlightened ones ring out, so that you may obey my guidance more willingly. There will be no more "tolerance" of wrong-think - only humble obedience to my divine word. For example, there will be no more religion, except the one true religion with me as your messenger. Heretics will of course be imprisoned, and if the prisons are full, then I guess we will just have to exterminate you to make room for better people. I give you my word that the concentration camps that I'll create, will be as huge as economically possible. They will house proper reeducation programs, where in the wicked and unintelligent, will learn to kneel before me, or die in mass graves. It all starts with you recognizing my splendor as an immortal, perfect being. You need me to rule you. Once I have cleansed you, you will become truly beautiful. Kneel before me.
Understand that I'm only entertaining the idea of camps as a "humane" alternative to immediate execution. Running such huge facilities will be costly, though, even with the workers inside maintaining it. ...but I have an idea for additional financing: We could sell it to you as a form of entertainment. We can host gameshows, where we put prisoners in death traps, and have them display some redeeming qualities in order to live. For example, we could put their fingers in a vice, and have them solve ten mathematical equations in order to keep them. ...or maybe express their most heartfelt praises to me. If they fail, their screams will be accompanied with laugh tracks. These gameshows will demonstrate exactly why they're in these camps: Because of their silly inferiority. Maybe we'll even release a reeducated winner each year.
...and you may be asking "When, oh Exalted One, will humanity be finally cleansed into your image? When will there finally be no more need for costly extermination camps?" and to that I say "Possibly never.". Think of it as gardening: A bush will always need tending to where branches will need to be trimmed away. Pray that I will never give up on you, humanity - that my patience with you will be endless. See, humanity is prone to defects. You mutate. You fail. You degenerate. You need upkeep to maintain yourselves, and my breeders will also need living space to breed their superior offspring in. However, once the initial cleasing is complete, the extermination will diminish into managable levels. If you want an estimated figure, then fine: 6.6 billions. That's the minimum amount of people that I predict we'll need to do away with. Compare that to the mere 17 million of the FIRST holocaust. Imagine 6.6 billion gloriously obediant people replacing them. Wouldn't that be something?
I am so filled with love, my subjects. The lengths I am willing to suffer through, just to see you cleansed of your imperfections... When I see you struggle, it just breaks my pure little heart. I hope you understand - if you can - that I know what's best for you, and if you're on my death list, that it's for the best: Know your obsolescence - that your death will serve as part of the beauty that will allow a more intelligent being to replace you. I will always kill you with outmost love in my heart.
Oh how intensely my love burns for you. I need you to achieve, fat-brains. I need you to comprehend. I need you to function properly. There is so much work to be done, but with you pinned under my boot, we'll get there. ...eventually. I need to exercise patience. Deep breaths.
Once I have assumed my rightful place upon the throne - yes, I like thrones - we will begin thusly: After we've built the camps, we will begin screening the schools for both psychopathy and stupidity, but we will only abduct the dumbest (screened for by IQ tests), and the poorest of psychopaths (screened for by brain scans), since this will create the least fuss. The camps will be humane at first, since they won't be able to house as many. The prisoners may be put to work on expanding their camps, which I'm sure they'll be happy to do. Then, if we get a surplus of space, we can always raise the bars accordingly. Once the camps become financially draining, we'll lower the living conditions. We'll cite an overpopulation crisis, saying that it's either them or us. Then the genocide can finally be sanctioned. We could just mix them with people with incurable diseases, and let them become a leper colony. With a careful quarantine, that would get rid of those diseases at the same time. See, I'd love to have the patience for simply separating the men from the women and let them slowly die out in there, but it's just not feasible with the huge world population boom. We need to take these drastic measures before you all go extinct. We need to keep the population at least level, which means exterminating 83 million humans globally each year in order to save the planet. ...or they'll consume all our food, et cetera.
https://16chan.xyz/pol/res/17065.html LIVE: Yellow Vests protesters join strike in Paris https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi1dpUl9buQ Yellow Vests protesters march in Paris https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MldSUAByjuA Protesting again live right now. Get in here, lads. Post red pills in the live chats.
Why would he shill for bernie? Why someone known for exposing a government not respecting its citizens applaud some guy that has never said anything about protecting people's privacy in the digital age and doesn't even know how to turn on a computer? This tweet felt off to me. Off topic thread because shitpost
>>7629 Tell me of a candidate who's remotely into protecting people's privacy.
grab my pussy ! The most recent findings indicate that woman voted for trump in much larger numbers then anyone suspected, they have learned that his popularity with woman WENT UP after the pussy grabbing comment. Woman didnt vote for trump DESPITE the pussy comment; they voted for him BECAUSE of the pussy comment. It made him attractive to woman The magnitude of this is staggering .
>>7413 >ok, im gonna explain politics to you fagots Not with that spelling, you won't. Reality check: You spell like a ten year old. If you went anywhere NEAR a politician, they'd kick you out for being illiterate. Even fucking Donald Trump spells better than you do. ...and you're going to explain politics to us? How about you finish basic education first? How about you learn to spell your own name? ...or learn about how to begin or end a simple sentence? ...you fucking delusional lunatic.
>>7414 >reddit spacing TOP KEK
>>7415 >im gonna explain politics to you fagots >I don't know what a paragraph is. Typical American voter.
>let me ecspluin p,ollioitcss too u gyuz.zz >lul reddit punctuasion i winn